There’s a strong possibility you’re an unhappy lawyer right now as you’re reading this. You may despise practicing law, and your day-to-day work could be “fine” or “just okay.” However, it’s safe to assume that operating as an attorney isn’t “great!” for you.

Most lawyers work six days a week, for a total of fifty hours each week, and it is now the standard to be available at all times, anywhere. As a result, it is not unusual for those hours to rise significantly during stressful circumstances and times off to become evasive.

Being a lawyer is fulfilling, but it’s easy to see why many in the industry, particularly associate attorneys, are unhappy.

Reasons why lawyers are unhappy

It is not hard to see why there are many unhappy lawyers in the legal field. Below are a few reasons that make lawyers unhappy;


It all starts in law school.

In many cases, law school is the easiest option for people who do not know what else to pursue, expecting that a J.D. will lead to a prosperous profession. As a result, law school serves as an acceptable means of deferring a more defined career path.

However, entering a firm appears to be the only option once in law school. The attraction of a big law firm, combined with the reality of school loans, locks law graduates in an endless cycle that leads to dissatisfaction and despair.

While law schools lay the foundations to big law firms so effectively that students almost always follow it on default, most of the curriculum is predicated on theoretical study and teaching students to “think like a lawyer.” As a result, J.D.s are partially equipped for the combative character of practicing law when they enter the workforce. But, unfortunately, law schools have failed to connect themselves with reality better.

People who graduate from law school have no idea what lawyers do. But, as it turns out, there are exceptions to the rule: lawyers who have chosen to think outside the ‘law box’ have a more happy and balanced profession.

While law schools do not educate students on how to practice law, most students look into practicing for small firms while attending law school.

The Job

Most attorneys work six days a week, for a total of fifty hours each week, and it is now the standard to be available at any time, anywhere. It is not typical for those hours to increase significantly during stress and days off to become elusive. Lawyers go through periods in their careers where they don’t even take a day off.

Because the job never quite fits their schedule, and clients paying hundreds of dollars per hour for their time correctly don’t enjoy delays. As a result, lawyers still find themselves dictating portions of motions, on occasional conference calls, or replying to emails even when on vacation.

There are undoubtedly other occupations where people work insane hours, such as bankers, doctors, entrepreneurs, and consultants. Still, the main conclusion is not everyone is cut out for the time and effort. Add to that the particular pleasure of the hourly pay.

For example, suppose a lawyer is not continuing working and recording time in six-minute increments. In that case, they are not compensated, and idle periods may lead to job loss for younger lawyers. It’s also unexpected as many lawyers are nearing the end of their careers.


The structure of the attorney-client relationship

A lawyer’s responsibility is to take on people’s issues and help them profer solutions. It’s a challenging and intellectual pursuit, but it’s also highly stressful. On a personal level, it is challenging working with specific clients. In addition, some individuals have unreasonable expectations about what they can achieve within the confines of the law.

Issues are frequently raised at the last-ditch, prompting a last-minute tussle to meet deadlines. Some clients’ problems are insolvable except managing the situation. Even when they win, some clients are overly critical of the job they receive. Even when cases are managed and handled smoothly, almost no one is happy with the costs. As a result, clients will occasionally try to avoid paying their bills.

Because their opposing counsel is just as focused on winning their cases as they are, many lawyers live lives of constant conflict. Some people enjoy it, while others find it to be highly stressful.

The daily activities of most lawyers are usually unexciting.

If you write and read a lot, you’ll probably enjoy being a litigator. However, many individuals go to law school thinking they’ll be like the lawyers they see on TV, who spend their days in court, conducting trials, and holding daily high-stakes conferences with power brokers. Practice, on the other hand, is a very different story.

Reading, creating documents, researching, evaluating other documents, and occasional communication with one’s opponent make up most legal work. For some lawyers, that is their sole source of income, but the work-to-action ratio is exceptionally high in any case.


Many lawyers don’t make a lot of money.

Many lawyers are having financial difficulties these days, especially with the rising expense of law school and the resulting student loan debt. Even those who earn hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars per year represent clients who are folds wealthier than they are, and those at the pinnacle of the legal profession work the most extended hours. Furthermore, lawyers are regarded with disdain by the common public.

Some individuals may wish they earn like a lawyer or have the same educational background as lawyers do, but you hardly hear a non-lawyer say they like and respect the legal profession. No, most of the questions are “how are you doing this?” or standard lawyer jokes. That’s okay, but many lawyers enter the profession seeking respect from others, oblivious that most people prefer never to deal with lawyers.


Lawyers seem to have or nurture a “pessimistic explanatory” style due to their education and job experience. Events are perceived as constant, uncontrollable, and ubiquitous in this way. Optimists consider problems to be local, transient, and adjustable. Pessimists perform poorly in business, athletics, and politics but flourish in law. But why is this the case?

Lawyers are compensated for managing the risk of others. Prudence is ingrained when problems are seen as pervasive and enduring. It aids lawyers in identifying all the dangers and issues that may afflict a client. As a result, lawyers can protect their clients in any eventuality, whether it’s plausible or unlikely.

Lawyers who can see how horrible things can be for their clients are thought to be saddled with the need to identify how bad things can be for themselves. It’s difficult to disconnect and not use lawyer reasoning to everyday life, whether relationships, vacation planning, or professional decisions, after years of learning and using this way of reasoning day in and day out.

It can be beneficial to transition from law to non-practicing roles, be it in-house, a law firm, or something completely different. However, for many people, that is too much of a change. Law is frequently more than a profession; it is a way of life.

Surprisingly, a bold move like the one described above can be beneficial. In many respects, legal thinking serves well in such roles, albeit repurposed to recognize business challenges and dependencies, both actual and potential, and assist colleagues in planning for them.


Lawyers, especially junior lawyers, are subjected to severe pressure and irregular hours and expectations. In corporate practices like a large law firm, working 100+ hours, seven-day weeks for months at a time is not unusual. Low decision latitude regarding what task to do or with whom to cooperate is also prevalent.

Low decision latitude daily, and generally when it comes to career development and direction, limit job satisfaction. At the same time, little contact with supervisors and almost no client interaction adds to the problem, isolating junior lawyers from the opportunities and activities to learn from others. Finally, low decision latitude, like pessimism, can spill into non-legal life. Low decision latitude, for example, causes a person to overlook the options available to them.

Lawyers who are considering leaving the profession often feel imprisoned. Beyond that, they see only a few options; go in-house, move law firms, or stick at it.

None of them make much of a difference in the issues raised here about legal dissatisfaction.

Furthermore, the pessimistic explaining style worsens this: most lawyers believe that they will have difficulty selling themselves into other professions due to the preconceptions that lawyers confront, such as; not technologically sound, non-enterprising, or risk-averse.

While stereotypes abound, they can be defeated with the correct connections and verifiable counter traits, just as they can be undone with most stereotypes.

Regardless, the reality remains that the legal profession’s lack of decision latitude often spills into any contemplation of changing careers, further diminishing happiness if a lawyer has restlessness.


Perfectionism is the remedy if the pessimistic explanatory style is how lawyers become brilliant at detecting and analyzing danger.

As a lawyer paid to manage risk, doing things “about right” is unacceptable. Even the tiniest blunder can end a long and distinguished career when the same mistake in other professions would be a blip except for medicine. As a result, “attention to detail” is taught and valued among lawyers.

Perfectionism is detrimental in everyday life. It’s referred to as the “maximizing mindset” by psychologists. In other words, anyone who seeks the best possible outcome in any scenario. Unfortunately, that isn’t always possible. As a result, there is a continual sense of dissatisfaction and regret.

Perfectionism, on the other hand, can lead to analysis paralysis. This means that it’s pretty simple to waste hours and hours agonizing over every detail in a decision. That is, feeling occupied and productive while unable to decide one way or the other. Even after deciding one way or the other, the decider is left with remorse or brooding on whether the other choice was, in fact, the superior one.

It’s a tendency that, like pessimism, easily flows from a profession into private life. It’s restricting and fuel for dissatisfaction when it happens.

Insecure Overachievers

Law firms and other related City professions are primarily to a fault, but not entirely. When hiring new employees, professional services organizations look for problem-solving, inventiveness, intellectual curiosity, enthusiasm, and passion.

Recruiting insecure overachievers in a profession with limited decision-making latitude that encourages perfection, pessimism, and pressure is inefficient for both the employee and the company. Unsurprisingly, a substantial number of lawyers are unhappy as a result. That’s acceptable if your business strategy allows for considerable talent churn. But, even if it can, isn’t there a better approach that consumes less talent and resources?

Why trash the legal profession that attracts talent when there are alternative careers?


That’s because many lawyers went to law school not because they desired to be lawyers, but because they coveted “prestige,” “money,” “respect,” or, unfortunately, because they couldn’t think of anything else to do. With comparable professions, aimlessness isn’t an issue. But, because of the arduous effort and years of study necessary, being a doctor requires a strong desire.

If your heart isn’t in it, you won’t persevere long enough to earn your M.D. and complete your residency. And if you wouldn’t want to be a banker or consultant, you’ll probably get fired or quit very fast, but at least those jobs don’t require advanced degrees for entry-level positions.

On the other hand, law school provides the worst of all worlds. It has lower entry barriers than medicine, making it desirable to persons looking for a way to achieve upper-middle-class stability and success. However, compared to banking or consulting, the law has a significantly higher exit cost, putting people in a challenging situation if they conclude they’re not suited for the job.

A law degree necessitates 3 years of post-undergraduate study — a major but not insurmountable time commitment — and is sometimes promoted as a “Swiss Army Knife” that could be valuable even though you don’t want to be a lawyer. As a result, law school attracts lots of people who aren’t particular about what they want to do with their lives but know they need to do something. Liberal arts grads are surprised to learn how much their degrees in Art History or English are worth in the industry, and people who want a “valuable” job to make their parents happy and inspire others.

In other words, many people decide to go to law school based on what they expect to gain from their degrees, which often necessitates pulling out one hundred thousand dollars or more in student loans. They don’t pause to consider whether they want to be attorneys, and the truth is that the majority of them don’t.

It’s one thing to realize within a year or two of working that you really shouldn’t be a consultant or banker; you may have blown your time, but you at least have a résumé line to show for it. But what if you wake up one day and decide you no longer want to be a lawyer? It’s not unusual for law students to owe a thousand dollars or more in student loans. Moreover, many persons starting or operating in expensive industries require a significant wage to service their debts and pay for necessities such as transportation, rent, etc.

Being a lawyer is the only way for most J.D.s to make enough money in many sectors. But, unfortunately, it’s the job they despise. As a result, you end up with a group of disgruntled employees who want to do something different but can’t afford a career change or cannot accept the bearish mobility that comes with a significant wage loss.

There are a lot of jobs that are more challenging than being a lawyer. Though it’s still a well-paying office job at the end of the day, and there’s no field in which so many highly educated individuals are incompatible with the work they’re required to do. It’s this imbalance that causes unhappiness.


Lawyers identity and are recruited for various characteristics, which are amplified by the demands of their training and current legal careers. Unfortunately, while these characteristics make successful lawyers in the current environment, they do not speak well for happiness.

You May Also Like: